Skip to content
The Bishop Says

The Bishop Says

ASL rules, tips, and tactics

  • Privacy Policy
  • Request
  • Resources
  • F.A.Q.
  • Contact
  • Acknowledgements
  • About
  • Toggle search form

Demystifying Slopes: TEM and Fire Lanes   

Posted on February 9, 2023February 28, 2023 By Jim Bishop 3 Comments on Demystifying Slopes: TEM and Fire Lanes   

The final topics to discuss as we close out this series are TEM and Fire Lanes. Like every other slope-related topic, these are really not too difficult either. They are each covered in a single paragraph in the ASLRB. As we will see, the key to resolving this is recognizing “Up-Slope” and “Down-Slope” Locations. If you need to, refer to the first article in this series if you need a refresher.

Rules Dive

First, let’s cover TEM. P2.41 covers TEM because of Slopes. To qualify for TEM, the target must be “Down-Slope” from the firer and occupy a Location with 3 or more “Down-Slope” hexsides or two non-contiguous “Down-Slope” hexsides. TEM due to slope only applies to Direct Fire, and even then, it only applies if the incoming fire also crosses a Slope hexside. The firer must be non-adjacent. The range to target must be greater than the elevation advantage for the TEM to count. Finally, Slope TEM is not cumulative with other positive TEM. 

Notice, being “Up-Slope” has no effect on TEM. “Up-Slope” does not negate FFMO/FFNAM, nor does it have any effect on Wall Advantage Rules. 

That’s it. If you distill it all down, to qualify for TEM, the target must be “Down-Slope” and it must occupy a Location with >= 3 “Down-Slope” hexside or at least two non-contiguous “Down-Slope” hexsides. The incoming Fire must be Direct Fire and it must cross a Slope hexside. Height Advantage can take away Slope TEM. Let’s look at some examples.

Example 1

The 5-4-8 is in a Location with two non-Contiguous “Down-Slope” hexsides. It might qualify for Slope TEM. The American 6-6-6 squad in M3 fires. Small arms fire on the IFT qualifies as Direct Fire. The LOF from this squad passes through a Slope hexside. Because of that, this shot qualifies for a +1 TEM versus that shot. 

The American 6-6-6 squad in M2 fires next. Remember, LOF/LOS across the vertex of a “Down-Slope” hexside still counts as part of that hexside. This potentially qualifies the German unit for TEM. However, note the American Squad is on Level 3. The Range to target is 2. The Height Advantage–the difference in levels between the two units–is three. Thus, the Height Advantage exceeds the range therefore Slope TEM is NA.

Example 2

Here, the German 5-4-8 is in a “Down-Slope” Location. If the American 6-6-6 fires its Inherent fire power at the German unit, this would qualify as Direct Fire. The German squad receives a +1 TEM against such an incoming shot. 

Instead, the American unit opts to fire the 60mm Mortar. According to C.1, OBA and Mortar fire are Indirect Fire. This might surprise some. Recall, Slope TEM only applies versus Direct Fire. If the mortar hits the German Squad, it will attack with a 4 FP and no TEM.

Fire Lanes

The rules covering Slopes and Fire Lanes are in P2.42. The only time this comes into play is if the firer is “Up-Slope” and ¾ of a level higher than the target. If both conditions are true, there is a +1 DRM to the Fire Lane attack as long as the target isn’t adjacent to the firer. An “Up-Slope” Fire Lane cannot attack a unit on a different base level. Let’s look at some examples.

Refer to the image above. The American half squads have laid two Fire Lanes down to slow the German progress. The Fire Lane out to Z3 passes through a Slope hexside. When compared to the 4-4-7, the American half squads are “Up-Slope”. This puts them at the same base level as the 4-4-7, but ¾ of a level higher. When resolving this Fire Lane, the 4-4-7 receives a +1 DRM. The Fire Lane to X8 does not cross a Slope hexside meaning the American half squads are not “Up-Slope” to the 5-4-8. Resolve the Fire Lane normally against the 5-4-8.

Conclusion

That concludes this series of short articles covering Slopes. I hope by now you can see they really aren’t that much of a bother. As we saw with LOS and movement, Slopes TEM and Fire Lanes are not that difficult to understand. They are certainly no more difficult than using any other section of the rules you seldom use. If they are in play, you spend a few moments refreshing your understanding and you get on with it. I encourage you to give them one more try. They really add a level of interest and their usage can breathe new life into an overused map. Until next time.

AFV, ASL, Infantry, Rules Tags:Slopes

Post navigation

Previous Post: Collateral Attacks and Residual Fire Power
Next Post: Scenario Analysis: BFP 109 Training Day

Related Posts

  • Wire And Routing ASL
  • Wall Advantage Edge Cases ASL
  • Fire Lanes ASL
  • Texas Team Tournament ASL
  • Maintaining Covered Arcs and Determining To Hit DRM  AFV
  • Smoke Mortars: A Constant Question ASL

More Related Articles

Wire And Routing ASL
Wall Advantage Edge Cases ASL
Fire Lanes ASL

Comments (3) on “Demystifying Slopes: TEM and Fire Lanes   ”

  1. Nate Gregg says:
    February 21, 2023 at 1:36 pm

    In the Fire Lane portion, does the below comment negate FFMO or is it just a +1 DRM in addition to possible FFNAM and FFMO?

    “When resolving this Fire Lane, the 4-4-7 receives a +1 DRM.“

    Thanks for helping to demystify slopes, Jim!

    Reply
    1. Nate Gregg says:
      February 21, 2023 at 1:38 pm

      Fire Lane. Stupid autocorrect.

      Reply
      1. Jim Bishop says:
        February 21, 2023 at 2:11 pm

        I fixed your original post.

        It is a DRM, not a Hindrance or TEM. It does not negate FFMO.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Jim Bishop on Good Order VehiclesMay 3, 2025

    Keep reading that rule (A21.2). It is quoted in the article. That rule specifically says "Abandoned enemy AFV". There is…

  2. Darryl on Good Order VehiclesMay 3, 2025

    But A21.2 also states "Otherwise, an Abandoned AFV can be captured only by a CC attack capture attempt in a…

  3. Tommi Lehtinen on Demystifying Slopes: LOSMarch 24, 2025

    Stupid auto-filler! It added my son's name instead of mine to the post. I.e. the previous post was made by…

  4. Elias Lehtinen on Demystifying Slopes: LOSMarch 24, 2025

    I have located a rule that unambiguously clarifies this point. Footnote 6 of Pegasus Bridge refers to section Q3.3 and…

  5. Stuart Brant on Texas Team TournamentMarch 22, 2025

    This is very true Jim, mainly go to Blackpool twice a year for the social aspect, just wish I could…

AFV AFV_Combat ASL ASL Maxims Chapter A Chapter C Chapter D Chapter F Control Etiquette Guest Author Gun Guns Guns As Targets Hatten Infantry Infantry_Combat Lets Look LOS Math OBA Planning Prisoners Rules Scenario Analysis Sleaze_Freeze Slopes Sniper Tactics Tournament Update

Recent Posts

  • Wire And Routing
  • Wall Advantage Edge Cases
  • Fire Lanes
  • Texas Team Tournament
  • Maintaining Covered Arcs and Determining To Hit DRM 

Categories

  • AFV
  • ASL
  • Chapter A
  • Chapter B
  • Chapter C
  • Chapter D
  • Chapter F
  • Infantry
  • Learning From My Mistakes
  • Missing Example
  • Opinion
  • Prisoners
  • Rules
  • Scenario Analysis
  • Tactics
  • Tournament
  • Unarmed Units
  • Uncategorized
  • Update
  • Blogs and Websites:
  • Sitrep
  • Hong Kong Wargamer
  • Six Plus One
  • Texas ASL
  • Old Sarges Wargame and Model Blog
  • Ritter Krieg

Article Archive:

  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Copyright © 2021 - 2023 The Bishop Says